Comments for Remote Spy Software Blog http://www.remotespy.com/blog Weblogs from CyberSpy Software Tue, 09 Dec 2008 04:52:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1 Comment on Keyloggers Don’t Hurt People, People Do by Benjamin Googins http://www.remotespy.com/blog/2008/11/keyloggers-dont-hurt-people/#comment-7 Benjamin Googins Tue, 09 Dec 2008 04:52:49 +0000 http://www.remotespy.com/blog/?p=12#comment-7 Hi, just one correction, my last name is Googins, not Goggins -- common error. I think the FTC is in a bit of a quandary on how to tackle this issue -- scope, goals, strategy. I will probably do a follow up soon on the latest in this case. Hi, just one correction, my last name is Googins, not Goggins — common error. I think the FTC is in a bit of a quandary on how to tackle this issue — scope, goals, strategy. I will probably do a follow up soon on the latest in this case.

]]> Comment on Harvard Law Misses the Mark by Andrew Ungberg http://www.remotespy.com/blog/2008/12/harvard-law-misses-the-mark/#comment-6 Andrew Ungberg Sat, 06 Dec 2008 03:32:08 +0000 http://www.remotespy.com/blog/?p=27#comment-6 Dear Mr. Ivey, Thank you for your interest in the JOLT Digest - we strive to provide neutral, useful information on current developments in technology law, and links to the insightful commentary of others on the subject. While we work to make our articles as factually accurate as possible, inevitably mistakes are made. Thank you for bringing one to our attention. A few notes about the article: - The article actually pertains to the decision by Judge Presnell to grant the TRO initially, at the request of the FTC on 11/6. Because of the limits of student journalism, we only became aware of this development on 11/17, and posted on the subject on 11/25. - The article incorrectly reports the TRO as resulting from a hearing on 11/17. Aside from this, the article is factually correct with regards to the substance of Judge Presnell's TRO of 11/6. - The confusion arose due to the 11/24 hearing, which we did not know about when our initial TRO-related post went live in the early hours of 11/25. This, combined with our incorrect reporting of a hearing on 11/17, made the topic of our article unclear. After reading your post about our article, we discovered the incorrect dates in original post and corrected them. Further, we have updated the article with the court's most recent order, including the reduced scope of the present injunction. Thank you again for reading the JOLT Digest, and helping us keep our information accurate. If you have any more comments to bring to our attention, you can contact the Digest staff at DigestContent@gmail.com. Sincerely, Andrew Ungberg Digest Executive Editor Dear Mr. Ivey,

Thank you for your interest in the JOLT Digest – we strive to provide neutral, useful information on current developments in technology law, and links to the insightful commentary of others on the subject. While we work to make our articles as factually accurate as possible, inevitably mistakes are made. Thank you for bringing one to our attention.

A few notes about the article:

- The article actually pertains to the decision by Judge Presnell to grant the TRO initially, at the request of the FTC on 11/6. Because of the limits of student journalism, we only became aware of this development on 11/17, and posted on the subject on 11/25.

- The article incorrectly reports the TRO as resulting from a hearing on 11/17. Aside from this, the article is factually correct with regards to the substance of Judge Presnell’s TRO of 11/6.

- The confusion arose due to the 11/24 hearing, which we did not know about when our initial TRO-related post went live in the early hours of 11/25. This, combined with our incorrect reporting of a hearing on 11/17, made the topic of our article unclear.

After reading your post about our article, we discovered the incorrect dates in original post and corrected them. Further, we have updated the article with the court’s most recent order, including the reduced scope of the present injunction.

Thank you again for reading the JOLT Digest, and helping us keep our information accurate. If you have any more comments to bring to our attention, you can contact the Digest staff at DigestContent@gmail.com.

Sincerely,

Andrew Ungberg
Digest Executive Editor

]]> Comment on Ban the Automobile, Too? by Luigi Di Serio http://www.remotespy.com/blog/2008/12/ban-the-automobile-too/#comment-4 Luigi Di Serio Sat, 06 Dec 2008 01:45:02 +0000 http://www.remotespy.com/blog/?p=21#comment-4 "the people abusing these technologies to break the law are the ones we should be focusing on." Well put! Let's ban cameras too, people use them to make child porn and for illegal espionage. What about crowbars, knifes and baseball bats? Common tools of the thug. The The FTC has to stop wasting its time (and ours) and go after the real criminals. Thankfully a judge with a brain saw how obvious it is that RemoteSpy is legit. Most news agencies need stories fast, so they don't dive into the issues anymore and expose the truth (like RemoteSpy does), they merely take a moral low ground stance and start ranting and raving in run-on paragraphs like like this one just to make a point about something they really don't understand or have no involvement in. Best Regards and cheers to Tracer for winning a key victory, one not only for the industry but one related to everyone's rights! “the people abusing these technologies to break the law are the ones we should be focusing on.”

Well put!

Let’s ban cameras too, people use them to make child porn and for illegal espionage. What about crowbars, knifes and baseball bats? Common tools of the thug. The The FTC has to stop wasting its time (and ours) and go after the real criminals.

Thankfully a judge with a brain saw how obvious it is that RemoteSpy is legit. Most news agencies need stories fast, so they don’t dive into the issues anymore and expose the truth (like RemoteSpy does), they merely take a moral low ground stance and start ranting and raving in run-on paragraphs like like this one just to make a point about something they really don’t understand or have no involvement in.

Best Regards and cheers to Tracer for winning a key victory, one not only for the industry but one related to everyone’s rights!

]]>